
Crimean‐Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a potentially severe disease caused by CCHF virus. As in other viral hemorrhagic fevers, it is considered that the course and outcome of the disease depend on the viral load and the balance among the immune response mediators, and that a fatal outcome is the result of a “cytokine storm.” The level of 27 cytokines was measured in serum samples taken from 29 patients during the acute phase of the disease. Two cases were fatal. Among survivors, significant differences between severe and non‐severe cases were observed in the levels of IP‐10, and MCP‐1, while the levels of IL‐1b, IL‐5, IL‐6, IL‐8, IL‐9, IL‐10, IL‐15, IP‐10, MCP‐1, TNF‐α, and RANTES differed significantly between fatal and non‐fatal cases ( P < 0.05). RANTES was negatively correlated with the outcome of the disease. A striking similarity with the cytokine patterns seen in Ebola virus disease was observed. A weak Th1 immune response was seen. The viral load was positively correlated with IL‐10, IP‐10, and MCP‐1 levels, and negatively correlated with the ratio IL‐12/IL‐10. Especially IP‐10 and MCP‐1 were significantly associated with the viral load, the severity and outcome of the disease, and they could act as biomarkers and, probably, as potential targets for treatment strategies design. J. Med. Virol. 88:21–27, 2016 . © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, biomarkers, chemokines, Middle Aged, Viral Load, cytokines, Young Adult, Child, Preschool, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever, Cytokines, Humans, Female, Hemorrhagic Fever, Crimean, Child, Biomarkers, Aged
Adult, Male, Adolescent, biomarkers, chemokines, Middle Aged, Viral Load, cytokines, Young Adult, Child, Preschool, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever, Cytokines, Humans, Female, Hemorrhagic Fever, Crimean, Child, Biomarkers, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 69 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
