
doi: 10.1002/jms.681
pmid: 15386749
AbstractIn extended kinetic method experiments, relative binding enthalpies (‘affinities’) and relative entropies are obtained based on unimolecular dissociation kinetics. A series of ion‐bound dimers AXBi is formed, in which the sample (A) and structurally similar reference molecules (Bi) are bridged by a central cation or anion (X). The branching ratios of the AXBi set to AX and BiX are determined at different internal energies, usually by subjecting AXBi to collisionally activated dissociation at various collision energies. The dependence of the natural logarithm of the branching ratios on the corresponding BiX bond enthalpies (X affinities of Bi) is evaluated as a function of internal energy to thereby deduce the AX bond enthalpy (X affinity of A) as well as an apparent relative entropy of the competitive dissociation channels, Δ(ΔSapp). Experiments with proton‐ and Na+‐bound dimers show that this approach can yield accurate binding enthalpies. In contrast, the derived Δ(ΔSapp) values do not correlate with the corresponding thermodynamic entropy differences between the channels leading to AX and BiX, even after scaling. The observed trends are reconciled by the transition state switching model. According to this model, the kinetics of barrierless dissociations, such as those encountered in kinetic method studies, are dominated by a family of tight transition states (‘entropy bottlenecks’) lying lower in energy than the corresponding dissociation thresholds. In general, the relative energies of these tight transition states approximately match those of the dissociation products, but their relative entropies tend to be much smaller, as observed experimentally. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Kinetics, Alanine, Entropy, Temperature, Amines, Models, Theoretical, Protons, Mass Spectrometry
Kinetics, Alanine, Entropy, Temperature, Amines, Models, Theoretical, Protons, Mass Spectrometry
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 45 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
