Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Magnetic ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Article . 2019 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Rapid automated liver quantitative susceptibility mapping

Authors: Ramin Jafari; Sujit Sheth; Pascal Spincemaille; Thanh D. Nguyen; Martin R. Prince; Yan Wen; Yihao Guo; +6 Authors

Rapid automated liver quantitative susceptibility mapping

Abstract

BackgroundAccurate measurement of the liver iron concentration (LIC) is needed to guide iron‐chelating therapy for patients with transfusional iron overload. In this work, we investigate the feasibility of automated quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) to measure the LIC.PurposeTo develop a rapid, robust, and automated liver QSM for clinical practice.Study TypeProspective.Population13 healthy subjects and 22 patients.Field Strength/Sequences1.5 T and 3 T/3D multiecho gradient‐recalled echo (GRE) sequence.AssessmentData were acquired using a 3D GRE sequence with an out‐of‐phase echo spacing with respect to each other. All odd echoes that were in‐phase (IP) were used to initialize the fat‐water separation and field estimation (T2*‐IDEAL) before performing QSM. Liver QSM was generated through an automated pipeline without manual intervention. This IP echo‐based initialization method was compared with an existing graph cuts initialization method (simultaneous phase unwrapping and removal of chemical shift, SPURS) in healthy subjects (n = 5). Reproducibility was assessed over four scanners at two field strengths from two manufacturers using healthy subjects (n = 8). Clinical feasibility was evaluated in patients (n = 22).Statistical TestsIP and SPURS initialization methods in both healthy subjects and patients were compared using paired t‐test and linear regression analysis to assess processing time and region of interest (ROI) measurements. Reproducibility of QSM, R2*, and proton density fat fraction (PDFF) among the four different scanners was assessed using linear regression, Bland–Altman analysis, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).ResultsLiver QSM using the IP method was found to be ~5.5 times faster than SPURS (P < 0.05) in initializing T2*‐IDEAL with similar outputs. Liver QSM using the IP method were reproducibly generated in all four scanners (average coefficient of determination 0.95, average slope 0.90, average bias 0.002 ppm, 95% limits of agreement between –0.06 to 0.07 ppm, ICC 0.97).Data ConclusionUse of IP echo‐based initialization enables robust water/fat separation and field estimation for automated, rapid, and reproducible liver QSM for clinical applications.Level of Evidence: 1Technical Efficacy: Stage 2J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:725–732.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Iron Overload, Liver, Iron, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Prospective Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    31
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
31
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
bronze