
AbstractPurpose:To explore the MR signatures of brown adipose tissue (BAT) compared with white adipose tissue (WAT) using single‐voxel MR spectroscopy.Materials and Methods:1H MR STEAM spectra were acquired from a 3 Tesla clinical whole body scanner from seven excised murine adipose tissue samples of BAT (n = 4) and WAT (n = 3). Spectra were acquired at multiple echo times (TEs) and inversion times (TIs) to measure the T1, T2, and T2‐corrected peak areas. A theoretical triglyceride model characterized the fat in terms of number of double bonds (ndb) and number of methylene‐interrupted double bonds (nmidb).Results:Negligible differences between WAT and BAT were seen in the T1 and T2 of fat and the T2 of water. However, the water fraction in BAT was higher (48.5%) compared with WAT (7.1%) and the T1 of water was lower in BAT (618 ms) compared with WAT (1053 ms). The fat spectrum also differed, indicating lower levels of unsaturated triglycerides in BAT (ndb = 2.7, nmidb = 0.7) compared with WAT (ndb = 3.3, nmidb = 1.0).Conclusion:We have demonstrated that there are several key MR‐based signatures of BAT and WAT that may allow differentiation on MR imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2011;. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Male, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Adipose Tissue, White, Body Weight, Reproducibility of Results, Water, Body Temperature, Cohort Studies, Mice, Adipose Tissue, Brown, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Animals, Female
Male, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Adipose Tissue, White, Body Weight, Reproducibility of Results, Water, Body Temperature, Cohort Studies, Mice, Adipose Tissue, Brown, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Animals, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 111 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
