AbstractPurpose:To compare generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA), modified sensitivity encoding (mSENSE), and SENSE in phase‐contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC‐MRI) applications.Materials and Methods:Aliasing of the torso can occur in PC‐MRI applications. If the data are further undersampled for parallel imaging, SENSE can be problematic in correctly unaliasing signals due to coil sensitivity maps that do not match that of the aliased volume. Here, a method for estimating coil sensitivities in flow applications is described. Normal volunteers (n = 5) were scanned on a 1.5 T MRI scanner and underwent PC‐MRI scans using GRAPPA, mSENSE, SENSE, and conventional PC‐MRI acquisitions. Peak velocity and flow through the aorta and pulmonary artery were evaluated.Results:Bland–Altman statistics for flow in the aorta and pulmonary artery acquired with mSENSE and GRAPPA methods (R = 2 and R = 3 cases) have comparable mean differences to flow acquired with conventional PC‐MRI. GRAPPA and mSENSE PC‐MRI have more robust measurements than SENSE when there is aliasing artifact caused by insufficient coil sensitivity maps. For peak velocity, there are no considerable differences among the mSENSE, GRAPPA, and SENSE reconstructions and are comparable to conventional PC‐MRI.Conclusion:Flow measurements of images reconstructed with autocalibration techniques have comparable agreement with conventional PC‐MRI and provide robust measurements in the presence of wraparound. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;31:1004–1014. ©2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.