
AbstractPurpose:To measure carotid plaque components using MRI and estimate reliability in the population‐based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study.Materials and Methods:Contrast‐enhanced high‐resolution (0.51 × 0.58 × 2 mm3) MRI images were acquired through internal (ICA) and common carotid arteries (CCA) of 2066 ARIC participants at four sites. Sixty‐one exams were repeated and 164 pairs had repeated interpretations. Plaque component thicknesses, areas and volumes over eight slices (1.6‐cm segment) were measured. Intraplaque hemorrhage was recorded. Reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlations and κ statistics.Results:There were 1769 successful MRI exams (mean age 71 years; 57% females; 81% white; 19% African‐Americans). Repeat scan reliability was highest for CCA lumen area (0.94) and maximum wall thickness (0.89), ICA lumen area (0.89) and maximum wall thickness (0.77) and total wall volume (0.79), and lowest for small structures—core volume (0.30) and mean cap thickness (0.38). Overall reliability was primarily related to reader variability rather than scan acquisition. K's for presence of core, calcification and hemorrhage were fair to good. White men had the thickest plaques (average maximum ICA wall thickness = 2.3 mm) and the most cores (34%).Conclusion:The most important limiting factor for MRI measurements of plaque components is reader variability. Measurement error depends largely on the analyzed structure's size. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010; 31: 406–415. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Male, Incidence, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity, Middle Aged, Intracranial Arteriosclerosis, Risk Assessment, Sensitivity and Specificity, Risk Factors, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Carotid Stenosis, Female, Magnetic Resonance Angiography
Male, Incidence, Reproducibility of Results, Comorbidity, Middle Aged, Intracranial Arteriosclerosis, Risk Assessment, Sensitivity and Specificity, Risk Factors, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Carotid Stenosis, Female, Magnetic Resonance Angiography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 67 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
