
doi: 10.1002/jmri.20286
pmid: 15779037
AbstractPurposeTo investigate the dependence of line scan diffusion imaging (LSDI) in the lumbar vertebral discs on diffusion weighting, fat suppression (FS), and postprocessing noise correction.Materials and MethodsEleven normal volunteers were scanned using 4 b‐value and 12 b‐value LSDI protocols, with and without FS. Three repeated four b‐value scans were performed for evaluation of the reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values calculated with mono‐ and biexponential decay models. Two‐point ADC analysis for 12 b‐value scans was performed with and without noise correction to evaluate the ADC dependence on diffusion weighting. Correlations between different ADC calculation and acquisition methods were evaluated.ResultsMonoexponential ADC measures had a coefficient of variation (CV) under 3%, while use of a constrained biexponential increased the CV to 6% to 9%. Strong dependence on b‐value was seen from chemically shifted marrow fat signal and noise. These systematic variations in ADC were eliminated using noise correction and FS. ADC values from 4 and 12 b‐value FS scans correlated strongly (R2 = 0.91), while biexponentially derived ADC values correlated moderately well with the FS ADC (R2 = 0.51).ConclusionLSDI gives reproducible ADC measurements in the lumbar discs, largely independent of b‐value and signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) when used with noise correction and FS. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2005;21:482–488. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Adult, Male, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Lumbar Vertebrae, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Female, Intervertebral Disc, Algorithms
Adult, Male, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Lumbar Vertebrae, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Female, Intervertebral Disc, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
