Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Molecular...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Molecular Recognition
Article . 2004 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Solid‐phase biotinylation of antibodies

Authors: Elizabeth, Strachan; A Krishna, Mallia; Joanna M, Cox; Babu, Antharavally; Surbhi, Desai; Laura, Sykaluk; Valerie, O'Sullivan; +1 Authors

Solid‐phase biotinylation of antibodies

Abstract

AbstractBiotinylation is an established method of labeling antibody molecules for several applications in life science research. Antibody functional groups such as amines, cis hydroxyls in carbohydrates or sulfhydryls may be modified with a variety of biotinylation reagents. Solution‐based biotinylation is accomplished by incubating antibody in an appropriate buffered solution with biotinylation reagent. Unreacted biotinylation reagent must be removed via dialysis, diafiltration or desalting. Disadvantages of the solution‐based approach include dilution and loss of antibody during post‐reaction purification steps, and difficulty in biotinylation and recovery of small amounts of antibody. Solid‐phase antibody biotinylation exploits the affinity of mammalian IgG‐class antibodies for nickel IMAC (immobilized metal affinity chromatography) supports. In this method, antibody is immobilized on a nickel‐chelated chromatography support and derivitized on‐column. Excess reagents are easily washed away following reaction, and biotinylated IgG molecule is recovered under mild elution conditions. Successful solid phase labeling of antibodies through both amine and sulfhydryl groups is reported, in both column and mini‐spin column formats. Human or goat IgG was bound to a Ni‐IDA support. For sulfhydryl labeling, native disulfide bonds were reduced with TCEP, and reduced IgG was biotinylated with maleimide–PEO2 biotin. For amine labeling, immobilized human IgG was incubated with a solution of NHS–PEO4 biotin. Biotinylated IgG was eluted from the columns using a buffered 0.2 M imidazole solution and characterized by ELISA, HABA/avidin assay, probing with a streptavidin–alkaline phosphatase conjugate, and binding to a monomeric avidin column. The solid phase protocol for sulfhydryl labeling is significantly shorter than the corresponding solution phase method. Biotinylation in solid phase is convenient, efficient and easily applicable to small amounts of antibody (e.g. 100 μg). Antibody biotinylated on‐column was found to be equivalent in stability and antigen‐recognition ability to antibody biotinylated in solution. Solid‐phase methods utilizing Ni‐IDA resin have potential for labeling nucleic acids, histidine‐rich proteins and recombinant proteins containing polyhistidine purification tags, and may also be applicable for other affinity systems and labels. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords

Nickel, Goats, Blotting, Western, Animals, Biotin, Humans, Biotinylation, Antigens, Buffers, Antibodies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    26
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
26
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!