
doi: 10.1002/jmor.10263
pmid: 15549680
AbstractThe identity and taxonomic distribution of paranasal sinuses among living platyrrhines has remained a contentious issue (e.g., Cave [1967] Am J Phys Anthropol 26:277–288 vs. Hershkovitz [1977] Chicago: University of Chicago Press) largely because the ontogenetic data required for their detection and identification (e.g., Cave [1967]; Maier [2000] Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 99–132.) were not attainable without sacrificing valuable juvenile and subadult specimens. Non‐invasive computed tomography (CT) scanning of ontogenetic series of skulls for 10 platyrrhine genera demonstrates the presence of maxillary and ethmoid sinuses, as well as homologs of the human sphenoid and frontal sinuses. Differences in the latter two sinuses between platyrrhines and hominoids highlight the need for early developmental data in establishing sinus homology. In particular, the identification of homologous recesses in the cartilaginous nasal capsule, from which sinuses later develop, emerges as the critical step. This developmental approach also reveals that the anterior and posterior ethmoid sinuses are each sets of serial homologs, a point which reconciles previous difficulties in establishing sinus homologies across mammalian orders (e.g., Paulli [1900] Gegenbaurs Morphol Jahrb 28:147–178, 179–251, 483–564). © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Male, Sphenoid Sinus, Age Factors, Maxillary Sinus, Platyrrhini, Ethmoid Sinus, Terminology as Topic, Paranasal Sinuses, Animals, Frontal Sinus, Humans, Female, Nasal Cavity, Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Male, Sphenoid Sinus, Age Factors, Maxillary Sinus, Platyrrhini, Ethmoid Sinus, Terminology as Topic, Paranasal Sinuses, Animals, Frontal Sinus, Humans, Female, Nasal Cavity, Tomography, X-Ray Computed
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 143 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
