
doi: 10.1002/jlb.67.3.441
pmid: 10733106
Abstract A novel pharmacological study of CCR3 receptor reserve in a CCR3-transfected cell (CREM3) and human eosinophils was done; functional responses measured were increases in intracellular calcium and chemotaxis. Eotaxin, eotaxin-2, monocyte chemoattractant protein-4 (MCP-4), RANTES, and MCP-3 induced similar maximal eosinophil chemotaxis, whereas MCP-3 and RANTES induced submaximal calcium responses in eosinophils compared to eotaxin, MCP-4, and eotaxin-2. This suggested a receptor reserve in the chemotaxis response. Receptor reserve was quantitated for eotaxin. Occupancy of all CCR3 receptors was required for a maximal calcium response in both CREM3 and eosinophils (reserve = 1.0 or 0.17, respectively); the stimulus-calcium response relationship was linear, indicating no receptor reserve. In contrast, in eosinophils a large receptor reserve (6.5) was found for chemotaxis, where occupancy of 15% receptors drove half-maximal responses. These studies indicate that CCR3 interacts with G-proteins that are poorly coupled to the calcium response, whereas coupling efficiency and/or amplification to the chemotaxis apparatus in human eosinophils is significantly greater. J. Leukoc. Biol. 67: 441–447; 2000.
Chemokine CCL11, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Chemotactic Factors, Eosinophil, Receptors, CCR3, Ligands, Binding, Competitive, Cell Line, Monocyte Chemoattractant Proteins, Rats, Eosinophils, Chemotaxis, Leukocyte, Chemokines, CC, Animals, Cytokines, Humans, Calcium, Receptors, Chemokine, Calcium Signaling, Chemokine CCL5, Cells, Cultured
Chemokine CCL11, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Chemotactic Factors, Eosinophil, Receptors, CCR3, Ligands, Binding, Competitive, Cell Line, Monocyte Chemoattractant Proteins, Rats, Eosinophils, Chemotaxis, Leukocyte, Chemokines, CC, Animals, Cytokines, Humans, Calcium, Receptors, Chemokine, Calcium Signaling, Chemokine CCL5, Cells, Cultured
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
