
AbstractOver the past 20 years, diagnostic testing for genetic diseases has evolved, leading to variable diagnostic certainty for individuals included in long‐term natural history studies. Using genotype and phenotype data from an ongoing natural history study of CLN3 disease, we developed a hierarchical diagnostic confidence scheme with three major classes: Definite, Probable, or Possible CLN3 disease. An additional level, CLN3 Disease PLUS, includes individuals with CLN3 disease plus an additional disorder with a separate etiology that substantially affects the phenotype. Within the Definite and Probable CLN3 disease classes, we further divided individuals into subclasses based on phenotype. After assigning participants to classes, we performed a blinded reclassification to assess the reliability of this scheme. A total of 134 individuals with suspected CLN3 disease were classified: 100 as Definite, 21 as Probable, and 7 as Possible. Six individuals were classified as CLN3‐PLUS. Phenotypes included the classical juvenile‐onset syndromic phenotype, a “vision loss only” phenotype, and an atypical syndromic phenotype. Some individuals were too young to fully classify phenotype. Test‐retest reliability showed 96% agreement. We created a reliable diagnostic confidence scheme for CLN3 disease that has excellent face validity. This scheme has implications for clinical research in CLN3 and other rare genetic neurodegenerative disorders.
Adult, Male, Membrane Glycoproteins, Adolescent, Genotype, Infant, Young Adult, Phenotype, Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinoses, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Child, Molecular Chaperones
Adult, Male, Membrane Glycoproteins, Adolescent, Genotype, Infant, Young Adult, Phenotype, Neuronal Ceroid-Lipofuscinoses, Child, Preschool, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Child, Molecular Chaperones
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
