
ABSTRACTBackgroundParoxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria (PNH) is characterised by haemolytic anaemia, bone marrow failure and thrombosis. The single‐arm phase 3 APPOINT‐PNH trial (NCT04820530) investigating iptacopan monotherapy in complement inhibitor‐naive patients demonstrated significant haemoglobin concentration improvements.MethodsWe used target trial emulation to retrospectively predict outcomes if APPOINT‐PNH trial patients had received C5 inhibitors instead of iptacopan. Estimates were derived from the real‐world APPEX cohort treated with routine C5 inhibitors. The study used benchmarking and comparative effectiveness to evaluate the haematological response in APPOINT‐PNH if patients had received C5 inhibitors. Treatment effect was estimated using propensity scores to model the probability of trial inclusion based on baseline covariates, followed by fitting an outcome model to the APPEX cohort.ResultsThe analysis of 125 patients showed all estimated treatment effects (95% confidence interval) favoured iptacopan over C5 inhibitors: differences in the proportion of patients achieving haemoglobin increase from baseline of ≥ 2 g/dL, 68.2% (40.9–95.6); haemoglobin levels of ≥ 12 g/dL, 53.4% (31.4–75.3); transfusion independence, 38.8% (15.1–62.5); ratio of percent change from baseline in lactate dehydrogenase levels, 0.51 (0.40–0.67); change from baseline in reticulocytes, −75.5 × 109/L (−106.9, −44.2).ConclusionsResults indicate C5 inhibitor‐naive patients with PNH may experience greater haematological response with iptacopan than with C5 inhibitors.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05842486
C5 inhibitors, Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs, paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria, RC633-647.5, APPEX, iptacopan, APPOINT‐PNH, Research Article
C5 inhibitors, Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs, paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria, RC633-647.5, APPEX, iptacopan, APPOINT‐PNH, Research Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
