Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Archivio della ricer...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Clinical Ultrasound
Article . 2022 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis

Authors: Bellini, Davide; Carbone, Iacopo;

Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis

Abstract

In this very interesting study, the authors compared the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography (US) with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for the evaluation of choledocholithiasis. The authors retrospectively selected 243 patients suspected for choledocholithiasis who underwent both US and MRCP within 1 month, then they compared common bile duct measurements, false positive and false negative percentages in common bile duct stone detection. The authors concluded that US is ideal as the first step in the diagnostic algorithm for choledocholithiasis. Diagnostic accuracy was high, in line with previously published paper (AUC = 0.727; 95% CI, 0.603–0.852). However, due to the high percentage of false negatives (16%), if patients have elevated liver enzymes or a high risk of CBD stones, MRCP is recommended. This paper underlines the role of US as first step in patients with suspected biliary stones, strengthen its importance in this clinical scenario. On the other hand, the role of MRCP deserves a more comprehensive evaluation

Country
Italy
Related Organizations
Keywords

Choledocholithiasis, Cholangiopancreatography, Magnetic Resonance, Humans, Gallstones, Sensitivity and Specificity, magnetic resonance; cholangiopancreatography; choledocholithiasis

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!