
doi: 10.1002/jctb.70034
AbstractBACKGROUNDMonoethanolamine‐based deep eutectic solvent (MEADES) at different molar ratios (1:2, 1:3, 1:4, 1:5, 1:6, and 1:7) was prepared and used for the isolation of cardanol from cashew nutshell liquid (CNSL).RESULTSIn this work, the density of MEADES at different molar ratios (1:2, 1:3, 1:4, 1:5, 1:6, and 1:7), isobutyl methyl ketone (IBMK), ethyl acetate (EtAc), acetone, hexane, methanol, ethanol, and butanol was measured at different temperatures (293.15–343.15 K). Subsequently, the density of the binary mixture of IBMK with EtAc over the whole composition range was measured at different temperatures (293.15–343.15 K). Further, the pH of all the prepared MEADES was determined and functional group analysis was carried out using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Finally, the experimental isolation of cardanol was conducted with feed:ternary mixtures at different solvent ratios (50:150, 50:125, 5:100, and 50:75 mL) and characterized using FTIR spectroscopy and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry.CONCLUSIONIt was observed that all the prepared deep eutectic solvents have strong hydrogen bonds between choline chloride (ChCl) and monoethanolamine (MEA) at all the studied molar ratios when the wavenumbers of individual compounds with mixtures of ChCl and MEA were compared. All the prepared MEADES used for isolation of cardanol from CNSL by varying the feed:ternary solvent ratios. It was concluded that the percentage of cardanol isolation was strongly dependent on the molar ratio of ChCl and MEA, and the volume of IBMK and EtAc as cosolvent in their mixtures. 98.93% cardanol isolation was achieved when using a 50 mL CNSL:75 mL mixture of solvents (i.e., 25 mL MEADES:25 mL IBMK:25 mL EtAc). © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
