Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Chemical ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Melittin recovery with efficient phospholipase A2 removal of apitoxin from cross‐flow ultrafiltration process

Authors: Evelin CV Brandão; Rafael I da Silva; Júlio CM Brito; Kátia CS Figueiredo;

Melittin recovery with efficient phospholipase A2 removal of apitoxin from cross‐flow ultrafiltration process

Abstract

AbstractBACKGROUNDBee venom (apitoxin) is a complex mixture of enzymes, peptides, amines, and other chemicals that presents diverse pharmaceutical activities. Melittin, a small peptide with 2.84 kDa, represents about 50% of this venom, on a dry basis. However, allergenic compounds, such as phospholipase A2 and hyaluronidase (enzymes with a molecular weight of 19 and 38 kDa, respectively), impair the direct use of apitoxin. The membrane separation process can be considered a potential approach for the fractionation of those components. Therefore, the cross‐flow ultrafiltration with a 10 kDa regenerated cellulose membrane was used to separate melittin from apitoxin, leading to lower fouling in the membrane.RESULTSThe strategy was divided into two steps: a 22 factorial design was conducted to evaluate apitoxin concentration and transmembrane pressure, followed by the study of flux decline and fouling mechanisms using the modified Hermia model. The best experimental condition led to 70% of melittin recovery and 99% of rejection of phospholipase A2. Membrane cleaning depicted a recovery of around 92% of flux and reduced 94% of transport resistance. The fouling mechanism revealed three mechanisms acting together in the process.CONCLUSIONThe results show significant values regarding the recovery of melittin and the removal of phospholipase A2, indicating that the cross‐flow ultrafiltration of apitoxin is an attractive option for the isolation of melittin, which has a high market value. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI)

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!