Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Chemical ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Extended gene expression for Gag VLP production achieved at bioreactor scale

Authors: Javier Fuenmayor; Laura Cervera; Francesc Gòdia; Amine Kamen;

Extended gene expression for Gag VLP production achieved at bioreactor scale

Abstract

AbstractBACKGROUNDTransient gene expression has been widely used for virus‐like particles (VLP) production in both small‐ and large‐scale systems. The extended gene expression (EGE) technique is based on repeated medium exchanges and retransfections of cell culture to prolong the production phase. The aim of this study was to demonstrate scalability of the approach by operating EGE continuously in a controlled bioreactor to obtain similar results to those achieved with shake flask EGE for VLP production. A standard batch cultivation was also carried out in shake flask.RESULTSFor EGE in shake flasks and in a bioreactor, cell viability was comparable; however, the bioreactor enabled much higher cell densities and specific growth rates than the shake flasks. Owing to this increased cell growth in the bioreactor, the percentage of GFP‐positive cells was considerably lower at the end than in the shake flasks. GagGFP VLP titers were similar in both shake flasks and bioreactor. Nanoparticle tracking analysis revealed that the ratio of VLPs/total particles (VLPs and cell vesicles) was higher in the shake flasks than in the bioreactor, possibly due to higher cell densities achieved in the bioreactor.CONCLUSIONSIn this study, EGE methodology was carried out in a bioreactor system for the first time while maintaining GagGFP production titers. Overall, our findings call for further optimization and implementation of common downstream processing steps to improve yield and VLP quality. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    19
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
19
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!