
Abstract The purpose of this qualitative study is to assess facilitating factors and barriers for medications to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD) initiation among justice‐involved individuals in one rural Appalachian community, as well as how those factors may differ across the three types of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved medications. Qualitative interviews were conducted with rural justice‐involved individuals ( N = 10) with a history of opioid use in the target community. Overall, participants demonstrated knowledge of the different types of MOUD and their pharmacological properties, but limited overall health literacy around opioid use disorder and MOUD treatment. Treatment access was hampered by transportation, time burdens, and costs. Findings call for research into improving health literacy education, training, and resources to decrease stigma and increase access to MOUD, particularly in light of the ongoing opioid crisis. State policies also need to increase access to all FDA medications among justice‐involved individuals, as well as supporting a care continuum from facility entry, release, and community re‐entry.
Male, Adult, Rural Population, Appalachian Region, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Middle Aged, Opioid-Related Disorders, Health Services Accessibility, United States, Health Literacy, Buprenorphine, Opiate Substitution Treatment, Humans, Female, Qualitative Research
Male, Adult, Rural Population, Appalachian Region, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Middle Aged, Opioid-Related Disorders, Health Services Accessibility, United States, Health Literacy, Buprenorphine, Opiate Substitution Treatment, Humans, Female, Qualitative Research
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
