
BackgroundNon‐invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is extensively used in the detection of fetal trisomies 21, 18, and 13, which is promptly becoming a common clinical practice. Concerned about the clinical application of non‐invasive detection of the fetal autosomal duplications or deletion.Case PresentationA 34‐year‐old, healthy pregnant woman was referred to the First Affiliated Hospital of the Air Force Medical University. The ultrasound examination indicates that low‐lying placenta, the fetus has a left ventricular bright spot and small amount of pericardial effusion. NIPT was chosen to further screen for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. NIPT results indicated an approximately 18 Mb deletion, which was verified by prenatal diagnosis. The chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) result showed about 19.2 Mb deletions in 21q11.2‐q22.11. The karyotype analysis result showed 46,XN,del(21)(q11.2q22.1). Prenatal diagnosis was consistent with NIPT results, and the paternal karyotype revealed no obvious abnormalities.ConclusionIn this study, we successfully detected and diagnosed deletions of large fragments in chromosome 21 in a fetus using NIPT. This indicates that NIPT can provide effective genetic information for detecting fetal subchromosomal deletions/duplications.
Adult, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 21, Brief Report, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Pregnancy, Karyotyping, Prenatal Diagnosis, Humans, Female, Chromosome Deletion, Cell-Free Nucleic Acids, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
Adult, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 21, Brief Report, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Pregnancy, Karyotyping, Prenatal Diagnosis, Humans, Female, Chromosome Deletion, Cell-Free Nucleic Acids, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
