Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Clinical ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Differences in erythrocyte sedimentation rates using a modified Westergren method and an alternate method

Authors: Elise Schapkaitz; Shilla RabuRabu; Marcel Engelbrecht;

Differences in erythrocyte sedimentation rates using a modified Westergren method and an alternate method

Abstract

IntroductionWorldwide laboratories have adopted the use of modified or alternate methods for measurement of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). The iSED from Alcor Scientific is a novel, alternate ESR method based on photometric aggregometry which offers improved operator safety and reduced analysis time. This study evaluated the diagnostic utility of the iSED in a South African patient population with a range of inflammatory disorders.MethodsWe compared the iSED with the predicate modified Westergren method (StaRRsed, Mechatronics, Zwaag, the Netherlands) measured at 60 minutes. Analysis was performed on K2EDTA samples at three ESR measurement ranges (<20, 20‐80 and >80 mm/h) in 120 pediatric and adult inpatients and outpatients over a 2‐week period. Precision, stability, and carryover were performed in accordance with the revised International Council for Standardisation in Haematology guidelines.ResultsThe iSED demonstrated acceptable imprecision with minimal carryover (2.86%). The correlation coefficients at the 3 ESR measurement ranges were r = 0.58, r = 0.71, and r = 0.56, respectively. The y‐intercepts were −10.74 (CI −29.17 to 7.69), −5.95 (CI −18.60 to 6.69) and 246.05 (CI 591.42‐99.31). This indicated a difference of a constant nature with an overall mean difference of 7.99 mm/h (CI 5.87‐10.13) (P < 0.001). iSED ESR measurements were stable up to 24 hours when stored at room temperature or at 4‐8°C.ConclusionThis study demonstrated differences in ESR results, predominantly at extremes of the analytical range, using an alternate method. Careful consideration and performance monitoring of these novel methods are advised.

Keywords

Adult, Blood Specimen Collection, Hematologic Tests, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Blood Sedimentation, Child, Sensitivity and Specificity

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    21
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
21
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
gold