
The enzymatic method for cholesterol determination can use either an endpoint or a kinetic method. Not much is known concerning the properties (K(m) and V(max)) of the commercial enzyme for the kinetic method. We measured the K(m) and V(max) of Brevibacterium, Streptomyces, Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Cellulomonas cholesterol oxidase. Brevibacterium gave the highest K(m) value (230.3 x 10(-4) M), followed by Streptomyces (2.17 x 10(-4) M), Cellulomonas (0.84 x 10(-4) M), and Pseudomonas (0.61 x 10(-4) M). The K(m) values and the linearity obtained from Streptomyces (2.6 mmol/L), Pseudomonas (2.1 mmol/L), or Cellulomonas (2.1 mmol/L) were too low. Dichlorophenol isomers, acting as inhibitors, increased the enzyme's K(m). The addition of 3,4-dichlorophenol raised the K(m) of Streptomyces from 2.17 x 10(-4) to 24.89 x 10(-4) M. The linearity was increased from 2.6 to 13.0 mmol/L. The high K(m) of Brevibacterium resulted in an insensitive reaction and low cholesterol linearity (7.8 mmol/L). An increase in the sample-to-reagent ratio from 1:100 to 1:10 enhanced the reaction rate and the linearity from 7.8 to 20.7 mmol/L. We suggest that Brevibacterium and Streptomyces cholesterol oxidase (with the addition of 3,4 dichlorophenol) are good sources for serum cholesterol determination by the kinetic method.
Kinetics, Cholesterol, Bacteria, Cholesterol Oxidase, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Brevibacterium, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Streptomyces, Cellulomonas
Kinetics, Cholesterol, Bacteria, Cholesterol Oxidase, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Brevibacterium, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Streptomyces, Cellulomonas
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
