
AbstractThe AM1/MST strategy for the computation of hydrated neutral molecules has been optimized. For this purpose, we have systematically explored the best cavity definition, the most suitable strategy to compute the molecular electrostatic potential (MEP), and the use of MEP scaling factors to correct the semiempirical MEPs. As a result, we have developed an optimized version of the AM1/MST method, which allows us to reproduce well the experimental free energies of hydration (root mean square, rms, deviation in the range of 1 kcal/mol) as well as the water‐induced dipoles computed at the 6‐31G*/MST level (rms deviations in the range of 0.3 D). © 1994 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 73 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
