
doi: 10.1002/jcb.20136
pmid: 15258901
AbstractRaman micro‐spectroscopy was used to discriminate between different types of bone cells commonly used in tissue engineering of bone, with the aim of developing a method of phenotypic identification and classification. Three types of bone cells were analysed: human primary osteoblasts (HOB), retroviral transfected human alveolar bone cells with SV40 large T antigen (SV40 AB), and osteoblast‐like human osteosarcoma derived MG63 cell line. Unsupervised principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) of the Raman spectra succeeded in discriminating the osteosarcoma derived MG63 cells from the non‐tumour cells (HOB and SV40 AB). No significant differences were observed between the Raman spectra of the HOB and SV40 AB cells, confirming the biochemical similarities between the two cell types. Difference spectra between tumour and non‐tumour cells suggested that the spectral discrimination is based on the fact that MG63 osteosarcoma derived cells are characterised by lower concentrations of nucleic acids and higher relative concentrations of proteins compared to the non‐tumour bone cells. A supervised classification model (LDA) was built and showed high cross‐validation sensitivity (100%) and specificity (95%) for discriminating the MG63 cells and the non‐tumour cells, with 96% of the cells being correctly classified either as tumour or non‐tumour derived cells. This study proves the feasibility of using Raman spectroscopy to identify in situ phenotypic differences in living cells. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Osteoblasts, Phenotype, Tissue Engineering, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Humans, Spectrum Analysis, Raman, Cell Line
Osteoblasts, Phenotype, Tissue Engineering, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Humans, Spectrum Analysis, Raman, Cell Line
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 86 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
