Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Computer ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Article . 2026 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
addClaim

Purpose Profiles in Informal Digital Learning of English: A Mixed‐Methods Study

Authors: Huijie Yao; Michelle Mingyue Gu; Yue Zhang;

Purpose Profiles in Informal Digital Learning of English: A Mixed‐Methods Study

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Research on Informal Digital Learning of English (IDLE) has largely emphasized engagement intensity, with less attention to learners' underlying purposes. Objectives This study identified purpose profiles in IDLE and examined their associations with digital competence, L2 emotions, and cross‐cultural competence. It also explored how instructional purposes related to informal purposes. Methods A sequential explanatory mixed‐methods design was adopted. Survey data from 686 EFL learners were analysed using latent profile analysis to derive configurations of four purposes: information, socialization, entertainment, and self‐instruction. Profile differences in digital competence, enjoyment, anxiety, cross‐cultural competence, and engagement frequency were tested. Follow‐up semi‐structured interviews with five participants were thematically analysed to illuminate how learning intentionality was positioned within informal engagement. Results and Conclusions Three distinct purpose configurations emerged. Profiles characterized by stronger purpose endorsement showed significantly higher digital competence, enjoyment, and cross‐cultural competence, whereas no significant differences were found for anxiety or engagement frequency. Qualitative findings illustrated three recurring patterns in how learning intentionality was positioned in relation to informal purposes: learning as a distal purpose, as a primary focus, and as an exclusive purpose. Two facilitative conditions associated with learning intentionality were also identified, namely awareness of language learning affordances in informal digital activities and facilitative links among different purposes. Overall, the findings underscore the potential of IDLE as a site for purposeful engagement that can accommodate both language learning and other life needs.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid