Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Clinical ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Clinical Apheresis
Article . 1992 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A fully automated method for mononuclear bone marrow cell concentration

Authors: J M, Rodriguez; M, Carmona; P, Noguerol; M, Ruiz; R, Parody; F, Vidal; J M, Perez-Hurtado; +1 Authors

A fully automated method for mononuclear bone marrow cell concentration

Abstract

AbstractWe describe our experience in processing 40 bone marrow aspirates harvested for autotransplantation from patients with several hematological diseases using the CS‐3000 blood cell separator. The bone marrow of the first 30 patients was processed by a semiautomated method, and a fully automated procedure was used for the remaining 10 cases.Both procedures were developed in our laboratory and yielded a similar average mononuclear cell recovery of 87.78% and 86.98%, respectively, and similar nucleated cell recovery (27.39% and 27.11%). The cloning efficiency of hematopoietic progenitor cells, measured as the total CFU‐GM colony recovery in the in vitro cultures, did not differ between processed and recovered mononuclear cells. On the other hand, all the patients with transplants showed complete hematologic recovery, and the time to engraftment was similar to that described for other procedures. The automated procedure resulted in an average red cell removal of 97.81%, similar to the semiautomated procedure (94.19%), though with a narrower range (96.31–98.6% vs. 80.34–98.34%). The time taken to process a similar amount of bone marrow cell suspension was very different for each method: 1 hour for the fully automated vs. 2 1/2 hours for the semiautomated method to process 1.000 ml. Furthermore, the semiautomated procedure required the addition of homologous or irradiated plasma in a laminar air flow chamber, while the automated method is performed in a closed sterile system. We conclude that our procedure using the CS‐3000 processor is an efficient method for fully automated large‐scale processing of human bone marrow cells. © 1992 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Keywords

Adult, Cryopreservation, Adolescent, Bone Marrow Purging, Graft Survival, Bone Marrow Cells, Cell Separation, Middle Aged, Transplantation, Autologous, Monocytes, Tissue Donors, Automation, Treatment Outcome, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Child, Preschool, Humans, Child, Bone Marrow Transplantation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    9
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
9
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!