Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Clinical ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Clinical Apheresis
Article . 1991 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Concentration of bone marrow mononuclear cells using a programmable blood cell separator

Authors: A R, Orlina; J C, Conant; P J, DeChristopher; A T, Lin;

Concentration of bone marrow mononuclear cells using a programmable blood cell separator

Abstract

AbstractBone marrow was collected from adult patients with various solid tumors who consented to participate in a study of myelo‐ablative chemotherapy followed by autologous bone marrow rescue. Twenty marrow suspensions were processed by using standard Procedure 3 (PRO‐3) for lymphocytapheresis without modification. A modified Procedure 1 (M‐PRO‐1) for plateletpheresis was employed for processing 34 marrow suspensions. For PRO‐3, mononuclear cell (MNC) recovery was 68 ± 22% of the starting marrow suspension (baseline), in a concentrate volume of 234 ± 53 ml. MNC represented 59 ± 27% of the total WBC count of the concentrate. The residual volume of RBC was 49 ± 47 ml. For M‐PRO‐1, MNC recovery was 63 ± 22% of the baseline in a concentrate volume of 200 ± 8 ml. MNC comprised 94 ± 7% of the total WBC count of the concentrate. RBC contamination was 7 ± 3 ml. Hematopoietic recovery, defined as the post‐transplant days when a sustained granulocyte count of 500/μL and a platelet count of 50,000/μL were achieved, was similar in the two groups and comparable to other reports utilizing otter methods and equipment for bone marrow concentration. Personnel time was significantly reduced compared to other procedures for bone marrow concentration due to increased automation.Although there was no significant difference in MNC recovery between the two groups (P > 0.5), M‐PRO‐1 was clearly superior to PRO‐3 because of the consistently high degree of purity of the MNC in the concentrate and minimal RBC contamination. M‐PRO‐1 is ideal in the setting of major ABO incompatible allogeneic marrow transplantation, marrow purging of malignant cells with 4‐HC, and in clinical situations where interim cryopreservation and storage of bone marrow are required.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Bone Marrow, Neoplasms, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Humans, Cell Count, Cell Separation, Hematopoietic Stem Cells, Transplantation, Autologous, Bone Marrow Transplantation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!