
doi: 10.1002/jca.20157
pmid: 18181166
AbstractObjective: To determine the prevalence and seroincidence of CMV seropositivity in plateletpheresis donors of different ages and gender. Methods: CMV antibody serostatus, birthdate, and date of first and most recent donation between the years 1976 and 2006 were retrieved from 222 plateletpheresis donor records at the Johns Hopkins Hospital Donor Center. CMV antibody serostatus was obtained for 183 donors at the most recent donation for which CMV antibody data were available. CMV antibody status and time interval between first and most recent donation were also obtained from 97 repeat plateletpheresis donors who were CMV antibody negative at time of first donation. Results: Overall CMV antibody positivity was 35.5% for 183 donors (mean age = 46.0 years) at time of most recent donation. CMV seropositivity tended to increase with age, being 37.5, 17.9, 37.5, 39.0, and 61.5% for donors aged 20–29 years (n = 8), 30–39 years (n = 39), 40–49 years (n = 64), 50–59 years (n = 59), and 60+ years (n = 13), respectively. Overall CMV seroincidence was 1.6 seroconversions per 100 person years with a rate of 1.4 seroconversions per 100 years for men and 2.3 for women. Conclusion: CMV seroprevalence and seroincidence in this plateletpheresis donor population are relatively low so that a large percentage of donors are likely to be able to provide CMV seronegative platelet components for many years. Our data suggest that targeting groups with lower CMV seroprevalence and seroincidence rates such as young people and possibly men will likely yield the highest percentage of CMV seronegative donors. J. Clin. Apheresis, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Adult, Blood Platelets, Male, Incidence, Cytomegalovirus, Blood Donors, Plasmapheresis, Middle Aged, Antibodies, Viral, Prevalence, Humans, Female
Adult, Blood Platelets, Male, Incidence, Cytomegalovirus, Blood Donors, Plasmapheresis, Middle Aged, Antibodies, Viral, Prevalence, Humans, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
