<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 8030442
Abstract We investigated several transformations of bone mineral content (BMC) and area density (BMD), in particular volumetric density (BMAD), to ascertain the influence on (1) body size dependence, (2) diagnostic sensitivity, and (3) precision. These transformations were examined in a group of 657 normal postmenopausal women and 327 women with osteoporotic fracture. First, expression of results as BMAD removed some of the slight dependence on body size; 21% of the variation in BMC and 15% of the variation in BMD were associated with body weight, but only 8% with BMAD. Second, the Z scores compared with those for age-matched controls for BMD and BMC were −1.85 and −1.71, respectively; the Z score for BMAD was −1.64. Third, the precision error for BMC was reduced by expressing results as BMD (1.1 versus 0.5%); BMAD degraded precision slightly (0.7%). BMD appeared to be the optimal expression for bone densitometry because it provided the best diagnostic sensitivity and lowest precision error; there was a minimal influence of body size on BMD results. This study also showed that osteoporotic women, even in the first postmenopausal decade, had low spine BMD, small vertebral area, and low body weight. Such women may be particularly at risk of crush fracture.
Age Factors, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Spine, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Risk Factors, Body Constitution, Humans, Spinal Fractures, Female, Menopause, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Aged
Age Factors, Middle Aged, Sensitivity and Specificity, Spine, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Risk Factors, Body Constitution, Humans, Spinal Fractures, Female, Menopause, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal, Aged
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 90 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |