<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
Abstract Both dual-photon absorptiometry (DPA) using 153Gd and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) can be used for measurement of bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD) of the total skeleton and its seven major regions. The short-term precision (coefficient of variation, CV) of DEXA for total-body BMD using the medium (20 minute) and fast (10 minute) speeds was 0.34 and 0.68% in 5 normal subjects; the corresponding CV in 5 osteoporotic females were 0.70 and 1.04%. The CV for BMD using DPA was 0.82% in 8 normal subjects and 0.70% in 12 osteoporotic patients. The CV for regional BMD using DPA was similar to fast-speed DEXA, without significant differences (p NS); precision with medium-speed DEXA was superior to DPA, and the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05) for head, spine, trunk, ribs, and pelvis. Total-body measurements using both DPA and DEXA were done on 99 subjects (84 females and 15 males). Significant correlations (r = 0.98; p < 0.001) were found between DEXA and DPA measurements of both BMC and BMD. There were also significant correlations (r = 0.94–0.98; p < 0.001) between DEXA and DPA measurements of anatomic regions (head, trunk, spine, pelvis, ribs, arms, and legs). DPA and DEXA results for BMD of total skeleton, ribs, pelvis, and legs were similar (p NS), and statistically significant differences were found in head, spine, and arm measurements (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively); regression equations allowed adjustment of DEXA values in patients already measured with the earlier DPA method.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Middle Aged, Evaluation Studie, Photon, Middle Age, Absorptiometry, Photon; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Density; Comparative Study; Densitometry, X-Ray; Evaluation Studies; Female; Human; Male; Middle Age; Osteoporosis, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Evaluation Studies as Topic, 80 and over, X-Ray, Humans, Osteoporosis, Comparative Study, Female, Absorptiometry, Densitometry, Human, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Middle Aged, Evaluation Studie, Photon, Middle Age, Absorptiometry, Photon; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Density; Comparative Study; Densitometry, X-Ray; Evaluation Studies; Female; Human; Male; Middle Age; Osteoporosis, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Evaluation Studies as Topic, 80 and over, X-Ray, Humans, Osteoporosis, Comparative Study, Female, Absorptiometry, Densitometry, Human, Aged
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 44 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |