
AbstractThe prevalence and severity of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders have led to growing research interest in the development of new biomaterials and medical devices for TMJ implant designs. In computational designs, however, the time and stretch direction dependences of the TMJ soft tissues behavior are not considered and they are frequently based on measurements taken from non‐human species or from joints that differ markedly from the human TMJ. The aim of this study was to accurately characterize the porous‐fibrous properties of the TMJ soft tissues by simulating previously published experimental tests, to assist professionals in the design of new TMJ implants. To that end, material parameters were determined assuming a uniform fiber orientation throughout the entire sample. This assumption was then tested by comparing these results with those of considering multiple regions and distinct fiber orientations in each sample. Our findings validated the use of a transversely isotropic hyperelastic material model to characterize the direction dependent behavior of TMJ soft tissues and its combination with porous hyperfoam material models to mimic the compressive response of the TMJ disc. In conclusion, constitutive model proposed accurately reproduce the mechanical response of the TMJ soft tissues at different strain rates and stretch directions.
Temporomandibular Joint, Finite Element Analysis, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Elastic Tissue, Models, Biological, Biomechanical Phenomena, Original Research Reports, Pressure, Humans, Computer Simulation, Stress, Mechanical, Porosity
Temporomandibular Joint, Finite Element Analysis, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders, Elastic Tissue, Models, Biological, Biomechanical Phenomena, Original Research Reports, Pressure, Humans, Computer Simulation, Stress, Mechanical, Porosity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
