
AbstractMaxillofacial prosthetic materials are used to rehabilitate patients suffering from acquired or congenital facial disfigurement. Silicone rubber materials [poly(dimethylsiloxane) rubbers] are the materials of choice. However, current formulations have inadequate mechanical properties, in particular, tear strength. The purpose of this study was to formulate a new poly(dimethylsiloxane) material with improved mechanical properties in comparison to commercially available materials. The formulations developed were based on condensation chemistry containing a hydroxy–end‐blocked poly(dimethylsiloxane), hydrophobic silica filler, silane cross‐linking agents, and a tin catalyst. The following parameters were varied in order to formulate improved materials: (a) bimodal polymeric mix (i.e., ratio of high‐ and low‐molecular‐weight polymers); (b) silica filler type and quantity. By varying these parameters a formulation was developed with a base polymer mix of 80%:20% high‐ to low‐molecular‐weight polymers into which 20% w/w filler was added. This formulation had a tear strength of 22.23 ± 1.6 m N/mm compared to the commercial materials having tear strengths in the range 4.53–17.63 N/mm. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 65B: 252–261, 2003
Maxillofacial Prosthesis, Silicones, Biocompatible Materials, 540, Prosthesis Design, Maxillofacial Abnormalities, Equipment Failure Analysis, Molecular Weight, Hardness, Tensile Strength, Materials Testing, Dimethylpolysiloxanes
Maxillofacial Prosthesis, Silicones, Biocompatible Materials, 540, Prosthesis Design, Maxillofacial Abnormalities, Equipment Failure Analysis, Molecular Weight, Hardness, Tensile Strength, Materials Testing, Dimethylpolysiloxanes
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 56 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
