
pmid: 6186666
AbstractThe degree of microleakage between a restoration and the cavity wall is difficult to quantify objectively. A silver‐staining method is used and compared to the radioisotope method with results that indicate a superior definition and more accurate evaluation of microleakage. In addition to the accuracy, two advantages are presented: (1) scoring of the leakage can be refined and divided into more precise numbers, and (2) teeth can be observed directly in a microscope without resorting to the indirect interpretation of film or photograph.
Silver, Staining and Labeling, Calcium Radioisotopes, Humans, Dental Restoration, Permanent, Radionuclide Imaging, Composite Resins, Tooth
Silver, Staining and Labeling, Calcium Radioisotopes, Humans, Dental Restoration, Permanent, Radionuclide Imaging, Composite Resins, Tooth
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 87 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
