Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Biomedica...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research
Article . 1974 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Materials in maxillofacial prosthetics

Authors: V A, Chalian; R W, Phillips;

Materials in maxillofacial prosthetics

Abstract

AbstractMaxillofacial prosthetic materials are classified in two main groups: extraoral and intraoral prosthetic materials.Among extraoral prosthetic materials vinyl chloride polymers, poly (methyl methacrylate), silicone, and polyurethane are discussed for use in facial prosthetics. At present silicones and polyurethane materials are considered most desirable for their strength, even though both are somewhat difficult to color.Intraoral prosthetic materials include silicones, poly (methyl methacrylate), Tantalum, Ticonium, Vitallium, and Titanium mesh materials. Here again, silicone is particularly valued for its tissue tolerability. Metallic mesh materials have the advantage of permitting granulated tissue to migrate through the mesh.The criteria for ideal materials in maxillofacial prosthetics are as follows: extraoral prostheses should not irritate the surrounding tissues, yet it should be strong enough about the periphery to endure. It should be translucent, light weight, easy to process, and easy to manipulate prior to processing. It should be resistant to various chemicals such as ether, oil and to sunlight, heat, and cold.Implantable prosthetic materials must not be physically modified by the soft tissue; must not be capable of inciting inflammatory or foreign body reaction; must be chemically inert, noncarcinogenic, capable of resisting strain, easy to construct, and easy to sterilize.Progress toward meeting these criteria depends upon cooperation between laboratory and clinical researchers.

Keywords

Maxillofacial Prosthesis, Polymers, Acrylic Resins, Silicones, Tantalum, Urethane, Dental Implantation, Dental Materials, Vitallium, Metals, Silicone Elastomers, Methylmethacrylates, Polyvinyls, Mouth Rehabilitation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    39
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
39
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!