
pmid: 11745534
AbstractOur previous studies have suggested that synthetic octacalcium phosphate (OCP) could be resorbed and replaced by newly formed bone if implanted in rat skull defects. We hypothesized that the implanted OCP is more resorbable than other commonly used bone graft substitutes of calcium phosphate compounds, such as hydroxyapatite (HA) and β‐tricalcium phosphate (β‐TCP). To test the hypothesis, the present study was designed to compare histomorphometrically resorption of the implanted OCP, HA, and β‐TCP, which were kept in the experimental cranial defect of rats for a long term. A full thickness of standardized trephine defect was made in the rat parietal bone, and the same volume of granules of OCP, HA, and β‐TCP were implanted into the defect. Five specimens of each group were fixed 6 months after implantation. The percentage of remaining implants (r‐Imp%) and newly formed bone (n‐Bone%) in the defect was analyzed histomorphometrically. The statistical analysis showed that the r‐Imp% of OCP was significantly lower than that of HA and β‐TCP. In contrast, the n‐Bone% of OCP was significantly higher than that of HA and β‐TCP. The present study has shown that the implanted OCP in the rat cranial defect is more resorbable than the implanted β‐TCP and HA, whereas the implanted OCP enhances bone formation more than the implanted β‐TCP and HA. © 2001 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 59: 29–34, 2002
Calcium Phosphates, Male, Mice, Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Hydroxyapatites, Rats, Wistar, Bone and Bones, Rats
Calcium Phosphates, Male, Mice, Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Hydroxyapatites, Rats, Wistar, Bone and Bones, Rats
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 177 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
