Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Journal of Applied T...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Applied Toxicology
Article . 2004 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Low‐level exposure of guinea pigs and marmosets to sarin vapour in air: lowest‐observable‐adverse‐effect level (LOAEL) for miosis

Authors: Helden, H.P.M. van; Trap, H.C.; Kuijpers, W.C.; Oostdijk, J.P.; Benschop, H.P.; Langenberg, J.P.;

Low‐level exposure of guinea pigs and marmosets to sarin vapour in air: lowest‐observable‐adverse‐effect level (LOAEL) for miosis

Abstract

AbstractThe purpose of this pilot study was to indicate, for low‐level exposure of conscious guinea pigs and marmoset monkeys to sarin vapour in air, the lowest‐observable‐adverse‐effect level (LOAEL) of sarin for miosis. This is the concentration × time (C·t) value (t = 5 h) of exposure at which miosis becomes significant.The ratio of pupil and iris diameters, measured on digital photographs taken on‐line during exposure, was calculated as a measure for miosis. The exposure concentrations were in the range 7–150 µg m−3 and the exposure times needed to achieve significant miosis were in the range 10–300 min. Both vehicle‐ and pyridostigmine‐pretreated animals were used in the experiments. The latter pretreatment resulted in ca. 30% inhibition of erythrocyte acetylcholinesterase in both species.In vehicle‐pretreated guinea pigs and marmosets the pupil size was decreased significantly (P < 0.05) at sarin doses of 1.8 ± 0.3 and 2.5 ± 0.8 mg min m−3, respectively. In pyridostigmine‐pretreated guinea pigs and marmosets the pupil size was affected significantly (P < 0.05) at 1.8 ± 0.5 and 3.0 ± 0.8 mg min m−3, respectively. Evidently there is no significant influence of pyridostigmine pretreatment on the LOAEL. These data were addressed in light of the recommended occupational and detection limits for sarin vapour in air. It was concluded that miosis will occur during low‐level sarin exposure at levels that are not detectable by the currently fielded alarm systems, assuming that humans are as sensitive for sarin vapour in air as guinea pigs and marmosets. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Country
Netherlands
Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Pyridostigmine, 101-26-8, 155-97-5, Chemical warfare agents, Iris, Field alarm, o-isopropyl methylphosphonofluoridate, Chemical Warfare Agents, Pyridostigmine, Priority journal, Inhalation Exposure, Sarin, 107-44-8, Air, Acetylcholinesterase, 9000-81-1, Calculation, Callithrix, Cavia, Miosis, Sarin, Lowest-observable-adverse-effect level (LOAEL), Statistical analysis, Pupil size, Erythrocyte enzyme, Acetylcholinesterase, Pyridostigmine Bromide, Exposure limits, Guinea Pigs, Data analysis, Article, Administration, Inhalation, Eye photography, Animalia, Animals, Animal experiment, Pilot study, Whole-body exposure, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Vapor, Pupil, Environmental exposure, Guinea pig, Nonhuman, Marmoset, Concentration (parameters), Marmosets, Volatilization, Nerve agent, Controlled study

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    21
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
21
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!