
doi: 10.1002/jat.1085
pmid: 16158389
AbstractBy its very nature, practice and intended applications, the profession of occupational toxicology has individual and collective responsibilities related to the design, conduct, interpretation and extrapolation of laboratory and controlled human clinical studies in order to determine the potential for industrial xenobiotics to produce adverse effects. The implications for health‐related adverse effects in the workplace, and in the domestic and general environment carries many and various responsibilities for the toxicologist which are related to multiple and wide‐ranging ethical issues. This review presents and discusses some of the major areas where the occupational toxicologist may experience potential ethical problems related to the conduct of routine professional activities. Emphasis is placed on the design, conduct, interpretation and reporting of laboratory studies; animal welfare; regulatory activities; human clinical volunteer studies; roles and responsibilities in defining workplace safety and protective measures; malpractices in various disciplines and work practices; misconduct in publication; and codes of ethical behavior. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Animal Experimentation, Safety Management, Conflict of Interest, Guidelines as Topic, Toxicology, Risk Assessment, Ethics, Professional, Human Experimentation, Research Design, Occupational Exposure, Government Regulation, Animals, Humans, Publication Bias
Animal Experimentation, Safety Management, Conflict of Interest, Guidelines as Topic, Toxicology, Risk Assessment, Ethics, Professional, Human Experimentation, Research Design, Occupational Exposure, Government Regulation, Animals, Humans, Publication Bias
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
