
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>doi: 10.1002/jae.1088
handle: 11383/5273
Many programming tools are available to the applied econometrician. There are high-level matrix languages mostly dedicated to econometrics (like GAUSS and Ox), to statistics (like Splus, R, or Stata) or to scientific computing broadly speaking (like Matlab, Octave, or Scilab). All these languages provide sufficient routines (in particular, related to matrix calculus and numerical optimization) to implement virtually any algorithm required by an econometric analysis. Why should we then suggest Python as yet another possibility when it is not even designed for scientific computing? Let us make a parallel with what happened in applied statistics: Lisp-Stat, an extension of the general-purpose language Lisp, was gradually given up at the end of the 1990s in favor of the free and open-source R. In 2005 Jan de Leeuw, a prominent actor in the R community, wrote:
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).  | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.  | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).  | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.  | Average | 
