
handle: 10419/189310 , 10419/100931
AbstractPhillips curves are central to discussions of inflation dynamics and monetary policy. The hybrid new Keynesian Phillips curve (NKPC) describes how past inflation, expected future inflation, and a measure of real aggregate demand drive the current inflation rate. This paper studies the (potential) weak identification of the NKPC under Generalized Method of Moments and traces this syndrome to a lack of higher‐order dynamics in exogenous variables. We employ analytic methods to understand the economics of the NKPC identification problem in the canonical three‐equation, new Keynesian model. We revisit the empirical evidence for the USA, the UK, and Canada by constructing tests and confidence intervals based on the Anderson and Rubin (1949) statistic, which is robust to weak identification. We also apply the Guggenberger and Smith (2008) LM test to the underlying NKPC pricing parameters. Both tests yield little evidence of forward‐looking inflation dynamics. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ddc:330, Phillips curve, Neukeynesianische Makroökonomik, Großbritannien, Momentenmethode, Inflation, Kanada, Keynesian, Phillips curve, Keynesian, identification, inflation, identification, inflation, Phillips-Kurve, C32, USA, E31, Schätzung, jel: jel:C32, jel: jel:E31
ddc:330, Phillips curve, Neukeynesianische Makroökonomik, Großbritannien, Momentenmethode, Inflation, Kanada, Keynesian, Phillips curve, Keynesian, identification, inflation, identification, inflation, Phillips-Kurve, C32, USA, E31, Schätzung, jel: jel:C32, jel: jel:E31
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 112 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
