
AbstractMolecular cloning has identified three opioid receptors: mu (MOR), delta (DOR) and kappa (KOR). Yet, cloning of these receptor types has offered little clarification to the diverse pharmacological profiles seen within the growing number of novel opioid ligands, which has led to the proposal of multiple subtypes. In the present study, utilizingin vitroandin vivomethods including the use of opioid receptor knockout mice, we find that certain antinociceptive effects of theKOR‐1 andKOR‐2 subtype‐selective ligands (+)‐(5α,7α,8β)‐N‐Methyl‐N‐[7‐(1‐pyrrolidinyl)‐1‐oxaspiro[4.5]dec‐8‐yl]‐benzene‐acetamide (U69, 593) and 4‐[(3,4‐Dichlorophenyl)acetyl]‐3‐(1‐pyrrolidinylmethyl)‐1‐piperazine‐carboxylic acid methyl ester fumarate (GR89, 696), respectively, are potentiated by antagonism ofMORandDORreceptors. We believe that our findings can be best explained by the existence ofKOR‐DORandKOR‐MORheteromers. We only find evidence for the existence of these heteromers in neurons mediating mechanical nociception, but not thermal nociception. These findings have important clinical ramifications as they reveal new drug targets that may provide avenues for more effective pain therapies.
Mice, Knockout, Receptors, Opioid, kappa, Receptors, Opioid, mu, Ligands, Analgesics, Opioid, Mice, HEK293 Cells, Receptors, Opioid, delta, Animals, Humans, Pain Measurement
Mice, Knockout, Receptors, Opioid, kappa, Receptors, Opioid, mu, Ligands, Analgesics, Opioid, Mice, HEK293 Cells, Receptors, Opioid, delta, Animals, Humans, Pain Measurement
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
