
doi: 10.1002/iub.1888
pmid: 30092117
AbstractBacterial persistence, the ability of bacteria to survive high concentrations of antibiotics for extended periods of time, is an important contributing factor to therapy failure and development of chronic and recurrent infections. Several recent studies have suggested that this persistence is mediated primarily by (p)ppGpp, through its interactions with toxin–antitoxin modules and polyphosphates. In this study, we address whether these key players play a role in mycobacterial persistence against antibiotics. We targeted these specific pathways in Mycobacterium smegmatis by constructing deletion strains of (p)ppGpp synthetase/hydrolase (relA), polyphosphate kinases (ppk1 and ppk2), exopolyphosphatases (ppx1 and ppx2), and the lon protease. None of these mutant strains exhibited altered levels of persisters against isoniazid and ciprofloxacin, when compared with wild‐type strain. Even under conditions in which the stringent response usually gets activated, these strains displayed wild‐type persister levels. Interestingly, we also found that unlike Escherichia coli, maintaining M. smegmatis in exponential phase by repeated passaging does not eliminate persisters suggesting that at least against the antibiotics tested, stationary‐phase dependent persisters (type I) are not the major contributors. Thus, our data demonstrate that multiple mechanisms of antibiotic persistence exist and that these vary widely among different bacterial species. © 2018 IUBMB Life, 70(9):836–844, 2018
Phosphotransferases (Phosphate Group Acceptor), Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Mycobacterium smegmatis, Guanosine Pentaphosphate, Humans, Tuberculosis, Anti-Bacterial Agents
Phosphotransferases (Phosphate Group Acceptor), Drug Resistance, Bacterial, Mycobacterium smegmatis, Guanosine Pentaphosphate, Humans, Tuberculosis, Anti-Bacterial Agents
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
