
AbstractThe Richardson‐Lucy (R‐L) algorithm has been widely used to restore degraded astronomical images. This algorithm is nothing more than the expectation‐maximization (EM) algorithm applied to Poisson data. The R‐L method is iterative in nature and converges to a (possibly local) maximum of the likelihood function. Unfortunately, because of the ill‐conditioned nature of the problem, this maximum likelihood estimate may actually be a very poor restoration. One way to prevent degradation of the restoration is to stop the iteration before it reaches convergence. A number of methods have been proposed for determining the optimal stopping point‐the point that provides the best trade‐off between restoring the image and amplifying the noise. Cross‐validation (CV) has recently been proposed as an advantageous method for determining the optimal stopping point. We propose a different form of CV based on generalized cross‐validation (GCV) that overcomes some of the difficulties of CV. We derive a GCV‐based criterion for the R‐L algorithm that can be efficiently evaluated at each iteration. We present examples displaying the power of the stopping rule and discuss the abilities and shortcomings of the method.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
