Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao International Journa...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Diagnostic accuracy of the placenta accreta index for placenta accreta spectrum: A prospective study

Authors: Hatem, Abu Hashim; Eman M, Shalaby; Mohammed H, Hussien; Mohamed, El Rakhawy;

Diagnostic accuracy of the placenta accreta index for placenta accreta spectrum: A prospective study

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo evaluate the role of the placenta accreta index (PAI) score in predicting placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).MethodsIn this prospective study, the PAI was applied to 100 third‐trimester pregnant women with at least one previous cesarean delivery (CS) and anterior low‐lying placenta or placenta previa. PAI score was calculated based on placental location, number of CS, abnormal placental lacunae, sagittal smallest myometrial thickness (SSMT), and bridging vessels. Histopathologic confirmation was obtained if hysterectomy was performed. Outcome measures were area under the receiver–operating characteristics curve (AUC‐ROC) and the best cut‐off point of PAI. Regression analysis of the PAI parameters was performed.ResultsThe PAI had an AUC of 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75–0.91). The best cut‐off point of PAI was 5.37, with a sensitivity of 83.9%, a specificity of 76.3%, a positive predictive value of 85.2%, a negative predictive value of 74.3%, and an accuracy of 81%. PAI parameters showed a significant association with histopathologically proven PAS (n = 23). The highest odds ratio (OR) was achieved with lacunae grades 2 and 3 (OR 9.22, 95% CI 2.02–42) and the lowest OR with SSMT <1.5 mm (OR 3.78, 95% CI 1.3–10.6).ConclusionThe PAI appears to be a promising predictor of PAS in high‐risk women who required hysterectomy.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Pregnancy, Placenta, Humans, Female, Placenta Accreta, Prospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!