
AbstractEarly studies reported a 4‐ to 6‐fold risk of breast cancer between women with extremely dense and fatty breasts. As most early studies were case‐control studies, we took advantage of a population‐based screening program to study density and breast cancer incidence in a cohort design. In the Capital Region, Denmark, women aged 50 to 69 are invited to screening biennially. Women screened November 2012 to December 2017 were included, and classified by BI‐RADS density code, version 4, at first screen after recruitment. Women were followed up for incident breast cancer, including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), to 2020 in nationwide pathology data. Rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were compared across density groups using Poisson‐regression. We included 189 609 women; 1 067 282 person‐years; and 4110 incident breast cancers/DCIS. Thirty‐three percent of women had BI‐RADS density code 1; 38% code 2; 24% code 3; 4.7% code 4; and missing 0.3%. Using women with BI‐RADS density code 1 as baseline; women with code 2 had RR 1.69 (95% CI 1.56‐1.84); women with code 3, RR 2.06 (95% CI 1.89‐2.25); and women with code 4, RR 2.37 (95% CI 1.05‐2.74). Results differed between observations accumulated during screening and above screening age. Our results indicated less difference in breast cancer risk across level of breast density than normally stated. Translated into absolute risk of breast cancer after age 50, we found a 6.2% risk for the one‐third of women with lowest density, and 14.7% for the 5% of women with highest density.
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating, Humans, Female, Breast Neoplasms, Cancer Epidemiology, Early Detection of Cancer, Breast Density, Mammography
Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating, Humans, Female, Breast Neoplasms, Cancer Epidemiology, Early Detection of Cancer, Breast Density, Mammography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 28 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
