
pmid: 1313399
AbstractPathological effects of asbestos are probably dependent on the size and surface properties of the fibers. Surface‐modified chrysotile fibers were injected into the pleural cavity of rats to investigate the potency of the fiber to induce mesothelioma. Chrysotile fibers were modified by a phosphorylation process, resulting in the presence of phosphorus at the fiber surface. Phosphorylated samples were characterized by enhanced durability and reduced affinity for biological macromolecules. Five samples were tested: I untreated and 4 phosphorylated. ChrP1, ChrP2 and ChrP3 corresponded to phosphorylated samples obtained by first, second and third passages through an Alpine classifier; Pm was defibrillated ChrP1. The number of fibers per microgram and the size distribution were determined by transmission electron microscopy and classified in 4 size groups. Groups of 35 rats were inoculated with 20 mg of fibers suspended in 0.9% NaCl solution. No mesothelioma was found in the saline controls. All fiber samples were proficient in producing mesothelioma; the percentages were different between groups and untreated chrysotile but not significantly so. The differences may be explained on the basis of the number of fibers injected which were > 8 μm in length and < 0.25 μm in diameter. The findings of a proficiency of long fibers to produce mesothelioma, previously reported by others for glass fibers, could be applied to chrysotile.
Male, Mesothelioma, Asbestos, Serpentine, Pleural Neoplasms, Asbestos, Phosphorus, Rats, Inbred Strains, Rats, Carcinogens, Animals, Phosphorylation
Male, Mesothelioma, Asbestos, Serpentine, Pleural Neoplasms, Asbestos, Phosphorus, Rats, Inbred Strains, Rats, Carcinogens, Animals, Phosphorylation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
