
doi: 10.1002/ijc.28395
pmid: 23893655
Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) represents a significant clinical challenge for which there are few treatment options. Oncolytic viruses are ideal candidates for PC treatment because of their high tumor specificity, excellent safety profile and suitability for peritoneal delivery. Here, we described the use of vvDD‐SR‐RFP, a recombinant vaccinia virus, in xenograft and syngeneic models of colorectal PC. Colorectal cancer cell lines were highly susceptible to vvDD‐SR‐RFP replication and cytotoxicity. Intraperitoneal delivery of vvDD‐SR‐RFP on Day 12 to mice with colorectal carcinomatosis significantly improved survival whereas survival was not improved following virus treatment on Day 8, when tumors were smaller. Immunohistochemistry revealed early tumors had a poorly distributed network of blood vessels and lower proliferation index compared to later tumors. Virus infection was also restricted to tumor rims following Day 8 treatment, whereas it was disseminated in tumors treated on Day 12. Additionally, direct infection of tumor endothelium was observed and virus infection correlated with a loss of endothelial staining and induction of cell death. Our results demonstrate that tumor vasculature has a critical role in virus delivery and tumor response. This will have significant implications in the clinical setting, both in understanding timing of therapies and in designing combination treatment strategies.
Oncolytic Virotherapy, Carcinoma, Vaccinia virus, Mice, SCID, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Mice, Inbred NOD, Animals, Humans, Peritoneal Neoplasms, Cell Proliferation
Oncolytic Virotherapy, Carcinoma, Vaccinia virus, Mice, SCID, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Mice, Inbred NOD, Animals, Humans, Peritoneal Neoplasms, Cell Proliferation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
