
doi: 10.1002/ijc.27963
pmid: 23180619
AbstractCancer develops through the accumulation of genetic and epigenetic abnormalities. The role of genetic alterations in cancer development has been demonstrated by reverse genetic approaches. However, evidence indicating the functional significance of epigenetic abnormalities remains limited due to the lack of means to actively modify coordinated epigenetic regulations in the genome. Application of the reprogramming technology may help researchers to overcome this limitation and shed new light on cancer research. Reprogramming is accompanied by dynamic changes of epigenetic modifications and is therefore considered to be a useful tool to induce global epigenetic changes in cancer genomes. We herein discuss the similarities between reprogramming processes and carcinogenesis and propose the potential use of reprogramming technology to help understanding of the significance of epigenetic regulations in cancer cells. We, also discuss the application of induced pluripotent stem cell technology to cancer modeling based on the similar characteristics between pluripotent stem cells and cancer cells.
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Polycomb Repressive Complex 2, DNA Methylation, Cellular Reprogramming, Epigenesis, Genetic, Genomic Imprinting, Genes, ras, Neoplasms, Animals, Humans, Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 Protein
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Polycomb Repressive Complex 2, DNA Methylation, Cellular Reprogramming, Epigenesis, Genetic, Genomic Imprinting, Genes, ras, Neoplasms, Animals, Humans, Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 Protein
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 41 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
