Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ International Journa...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
International Journal of Cancer
Article . 2010 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Prognostic significance of differentially expressed miRNAs in esophageal cancer

Authors: Yuxin, Hu; Arlene M, Correa; Ashraful, Hoque; Baoxiang, Guan; Fei, Ye; Jie, Huang; Stephen G, Swisher; +3 Authors

Prognostic significance of differentially expressed miRNAs in esophageal cancer

Abstract

AbstractAltered microRNA (miRNA) expression has been found to promote carcinogenesis, but little is known about the role of miRNAs in esophageal cancer. In this study, we selected 10 miRNAs and analyzed their expression in 10 esophageal cancer cell lines and 158 tissue specimens using Northern blotting and in situ hybridization, respectively. We found that Let‐7g, miR‐21 and miR‐195p were expressed in all 10 cell lines, miR‐9 and miR‐20a were not expressed in any of the cell lines, and miR‐16‐2, miR‐30e, miR‐34a, miR‐126 and miR‐200a were expressed in some of the cell lines but not others. In addition, transient transfection of miR‐34a inhibited c‐Met and cyclin D1 expression and esophageal cancer cell proliferation, whereas miR‐16‐2 suppressed RAR‐β2 expression and increased tumor cell proliferation. Furthermore, we found that miR‐126 expression was associated with tumor cell dedifferentiation and lymph node metastasis, miR‐16‐2 was associated with lymph node metastasis, and miR‐195p was associated with higher pathologic disease stages in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. Kaplan‐Meier analysis showed that miR‐16‐2 expression and miR‐30e expression were associated with shorter overall and disease‐free survival in all esophageal cancer patients. In addition, miR‐16‐2, miR‐30e and miR‐200a expression were associated with shorter overall and disease‐free survival in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma; however, miR‐16‐2, miR‐30e and miR‐200a expression were not associated with overall or disease‐free survival in squamous cell carcinoma patients. Our data indicate that further evaluation of miR‐30e and miR‐16‐2 as prognostic biomarkers is warranted in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma. In addition, the role of miR‐34a in esophageal cancer also warrants further study.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Esophageal Neoplasms, Gene Expression Profiling, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Adenocarcinoma, Middle Aged, Blotting, Northern, Immunohistochemistry, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, MicroRNAs, Ki-67 Antigen, Cell Line, Tumor, Multivariate Analysis, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Female, In Situ Hybridization, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    162
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
162
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 1%
bronze
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research