
doi: 10.1002/ijc.10514
pmid: 12115535
AbstractICAM‐1 plays an important role in cell–cell and cell–extracellular matrix interactions, especially tumor invasion and cytotoxicity of lymphocytes. In the present study, the relationship between metastasis of gastric cancer and ICAM‐1 expression by cancer cells or the serum level of s‐ICAM‐1 was (s‐ICAM‐1) was examined. ICAM‐1 was detected by immunohistochemic staining in 49.0% of 108 patients with gastric cancer. The ICAM‐1 expression rate was higher at a more advanced stage, based on lymph node metastasis, being 46.9% in node‐negative and 56.1% in node‐positive cases. In patients with liver metastasis, the rate was 90.9%, while it was 43.3% in patients without liver metastasis (p < 0.05). The serum s‐ICAM‐1 level was 262.1 ng/ml (median 205.5, range 176.0–271.0) in healthy subjects and 391.5 ng/ml (median 317.5, range 148.7–1,768.0) in gastric cancer patients (p < 0.001). The serum s‐ICAM‐1 level was significantly higher in patients with liver metastasis than in patients without liver metastasis (p < 0.0001). In addition, positive ICAM‐1 expression cases had significantly higher s‐ICAM‐1 levels than negative ones, 408.9 ± 188.4 and 308.1 ± 88.1 ng/ml, respectively. These results suggested that ICAM‐1 was overexpressed in cancer cells and released as s‐ICAM‐1, which would promote hematogenous metastasis by suppressing local anticancer immunity. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Solubility, Stomach Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Neoplasm Metastasis, Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1, Prognosis, Immunohistochemistry
Solubility, Stomach Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Neoplasm Metastasis, Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1, Prognosis, Immunohistochemistry
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 108 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
