
doi: 10.1002/iis2.12952
AbstractThe military has limited means to objectively evaluate soldier and squad performance, leading to sub‐optimal operational, training, and acquisition decisions. Part of this limitation stems from the fact that the ability to monitor, predict, and enhance soldier and squad performance is a complex System of Systems (SoS) undertaking. To address this integration challenge, we developed a comprehensive conceptual framework that maps mission‐level success to measures of task effectiveness and human performance that quantify the impact of emerging technologies and interventions. In addition, by leveraging lessons learned from a previous effort that developed a Wearables MBSE system architecture (MBSE‐SA) and methodology for military health monitoring systems, we developed a Human Performance MBSE‐SA to capture and apply the conceptual framework, which provides the foundation for several system‐level and program‐level analyses, including gap identification. This paper presents the Human Performance MBSE‐SA and an illustration of its utility in showing the connections among ongoing military research efforts, strategic source requirements, and operational use cases.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
