
doi: 10.1002/hup.2653
pmid: 29527722
AbstractObjectiveThis study aimed to determine the efficacy of the Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS) as a screening tool forDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition‐defined khat use disorder.MethodsCross‐sectional, purposive sample of past‐year khat consumers aged 16 and above were recruited from khat markets and cafes from university and general community in Adama, Ethiopia. Participants self‐completed a survey comprising current substance use disorder.ResultsThe SDS formed a unifactorial structure, consistent with the dependence construct. Almost three quarters (73%) of the sample were identified as experiencingDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Editionkhat use disorder. The SDS demonstrated excellent discrimination (area under the curve = 0.92) and an optimal cut‐off as a score of 3 or greater, with sensitivity of 81% and specificity of 96%. This classification validly identified a group with more frequent and higher dose khat use than participants that did not screen positive.ConclusionAlthough khat is a mild stimulant, there is clear evidence that some consumers are both concerned with their use and experience problems associated with their use. Consistent with its application for other drugs, the SDS is a brief and simple screening tool that appears to validly identify individuals experiencing a khat use disorder syndrome and experiencing high rates of adverse consequences in association with use.
Adult, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Adolescent, Substance-Related Disorders, Catha, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, ROC Curve, Humans, Female
Adult, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Adolescent, Substance-Related Disorders, Catha, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, ROC Curve, Humans, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
