<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 11385706
Automation for genotyping of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can be split into the automation of the sample preparation and the automation of the analysis technology. SNP genotyping methods are reviewed and solutions for their automation discussed. A panacea for SNP genotyping does not exist. Different scientific questions require adapted solutions. The choice of a technology for SNP genotyping depends on whether few different SNPs are to be genotyped in many individuals, or many different SNPs are to be genotyped in few individuals. The requirements of throughput and the ease of establishing an SNP genotyping operation are important, as well as the degree of integration. The potential and state-of-the-art of different solutions are outlined.
Genotype, Humans, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
Genotype, Humans, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 194 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |